Four types of volitional control mechanisms that may impact people’s knowledge-sharing practices

May 17, 2008

[Deutscher Titel: Vier Arten gewollter Kontrollmechanismen, die die Gepflogenheiten der Wissensteilung von Leuten beeinflussen dürften (Text übersetzen: Deutsch)]

Feng-Yang Kuo, Mei-Lien Young
A study of the intention-action gap in knowledge sharing practices
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Volume 59, Issue 8 , Pages 1224 – 1237

Abstract: Recently, several researchers have questioned the predicting power of intention to actual system usage (Burton-Jones & Straub, 2006; Jasperson, Carter, & Zmud, 2005; Kim & Malhotra, 2005; Kim, Malhotra, & Narasimhan, 2005; Limayem & Hirt, 2003). In this article, we report a study that investigates the gap between intention and usage by observing an Internet-based knowledge management system, SCTNet, from the perspective of volitional control. Relying on the theory of planned behavior and the theory of action control, we investigate four types of volitional control mechanisms that may impact people’s knowledge-sharing practices. Our results show that in knowledge-management-based knowledge sharing, people do not always perform in a manner consistent with their espoused beliefs. This intention-action inconsistency can be explained by perceived self-efficacy, but not by intention and controllability. In addition, a person’s action/state orientation moderates his or her enactment of intention toward knowledge sharing into behaviors. The main theoretical implication of this study is that the study of knowledge-management-based knowledge sharing has to go beyond intention to include the investigation of both the actual behaviors of knowledge sharing and the volitional control constructs that predict these behaviors. Furthermore, previous research has shown that the environment interacts reciprocally with individuals’ psychological control mechanisms in regulating their behaviors. Thus, the management must focus on the social and cultural attributes of organizational settings that may strengthen people’s volitional control in practicing knowledge sharing.

Index Terms: collaboration • intent • human behavior • information dissemination • organizational culture

Read/purchase the article online.

© ASIS&T
© John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Entry Filed under: Articles, Journals & Magazines, Study. .


c

Archive

Blog Stats

Feeds

Feed2eMail

Services


KM Events Calendar:
Home eMail Alert Feed

Blogs2Read @
Subscribe with Bloglines

KM-Bookmarks @

Tell-A-Friend!

RSS KM Events recently added

Top Posts (last 48 h)

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Articles

Associations (non-profit)

Associations (professional)

Awards

Blogroll

Books

Communities

Companies

Conferences

Consultings

Education

Events (not conferences)

Glossaries

Jobs

Journals & Magazines

Links

News

Newsgroups

Newsletters

Podcasts

Polls

Portals

Presentations

Products

Quotations

Research

Surveys

University

Who is Who

Wikis

Authors

Category Cloud

Articles Associations (non-profit) Associations (professional) Blogroll Books Case Study Communities Companies Conferences Consultings Education Events (not conferences) Interview Jobs Journals & Magazines Links News Newsgroups Newsletters Portals Products Projects Research Reviews Study Surveys University Video Who is Who Wikis

Tag Cloud

Absorptive capacity aesthetic theory Bidirectional knowledge transfer design knowledge design theory ERP Knowledge transfer Member loyalty Member satisfaction Social factors System characteristics Transfer activities Transfer context Virtual communities

Pages

Meta

MyBlogNetworks